OpenScholar 2.0 and the “Online Campus”

Recently I’ve been in discussions with @morganmundum and @tjoosten about the future of the LMS, or Learning Management System. At the same time, I’ve been exploring how Drupal, Moodle and other open source systems might be integrated to provide a unique learning environment that brings together the expected traditional academic features of an Learning Management System (LMS), the potential content creation and collaboration benefits of a Content Management System (CMS) and the personal interactivity and relationship building possible from Social Networking.

In my mind I have envisioned this as essentially an “online campus,” wherein there is no division of administration, academic and social online activities for students, faculty, alumni, partners and adminstrators alike.

Working with both Drupal and Moodle has been a fascinating endeavor, exploring both to learn their nuances, both good and bad, and trying to identify how to foster their strengths and weaknesses.  This has been challenging and engaging, and I have worked closely with certain faculty members and other institutions to identify what they are interested in seeing as the concept of the “Online Campus” evolves.

Enter OpenScholar.  Harvard has released OpenScholar 2.0, which is described on their site in the following manner:

OpenScholar represents a paradigm shift in how the personal academic and research web sites are created and maintained. Built on the open-source framework Drupal, OpenScholar makes it possible to create academic web sites in a matter of seconds. Each web site comes with a suite of powerful tools from which users can facilitate the creation, distribution, and preservation of knowledge faster and more efficiently than ever before.

link

I’ll be downloading and installing this in the next few weeks to explore and see what the potential is and if this does truly mark a “paradigm shift” as marketed.  In the meantime, take a look at the video below showing some of the features and functionality.

Recognizing this is still early, and is still focused on academic web sites, so to speak, is the the right direction for an “Online Campus?” What’s missing?

Scholars Web Sites Project Overview from IQSS on Vimeo.

What should be included in an “Online Campus?” Is there a better name for this concept?

Does OpenScholar push the envelope of the LMS, or is it simply a redesign of old concepts?

A Student’s Views on Technology and Teaching

Question: What were your big research findings about student views on technology and teaching? What surprised you? What would be the main things that you would like both professors and the leadership of colleges and universities to understand?

Students really love to feel like their prof cares about how they engage with the material. Most students are inspired by professors who listen to them discuss their opinions, who give them in-depth feedback on assessments, and who ask for student questions. In the discussion forum, almost every student says that their ideal class would be no larger than 20 people, despite the fact that those participating are a blend of Econ, Bio, Pre-med, English, Language, History, Engineering, Gov, and so on. While not every class at Dartmouth can be a small seminar, professors who have virtual, written, or in-person dialogues with their students make those students feel empowered to learn. That’s where technology comes in– even if the format of a class makes discussion tough or one-on-one interaction between students and profs difficult– technology can provide an easy way to begin a dialogue, to be perpetually re-evaluating the new ideas and facts of a course in a multilogue.

Additionally, Dartmouth students love to feel a degree of control of their education. They love a firm set of learning expectations that have open-ended potential for fulfillment. Across the board, students noted that they would like to have the opportunity for many different types of assignments and assessments. With the classroom technology we have today, students could make a movie, create a webinar, write a blog, give a presentation supported by Ppt, or take their exam online; and learning materials can be movies, news links, podcasts, journals from any time or place in the world, virtual tutorials, or online texts. If the professor can establish a universal criteria for what the project conveys, students love to have choice in the way they convey those expectations.

I was surprised that even though some students love Blackboard discussions, Powerpoint slides, and lecture recordings; almost an equal number hate them. It turns out, that while students like to have these technological “accessories” there as resources, when their profs do not read the Bb posts, only use a Powerpoint presentation to teach, or use lecture capture in the place of office hours, that these tools can defeat that valuable personal interaction between the professor and the student that I spoke of before.

More than anything, I would encourage professors to involve students in their own learning experience. Ask your students to take a pre-course survey one week before class starts. How do they learn best? What aspect of the course topic interests them most? What kind of assignments do they like? Is there any skill or aspect of the course that they feel apprehensive about? Best case, this allows professors to set the bar high for personal investment in the course, allows them to tailor the course to the students’ interests, sends a message that the professor genuinely cares about the students’ experience, and takes the first step in establishing that invaluable dialogue. Worst case, the professor gets some info about their students and doesn’t end up changing the course.

As I begin writing my dissertation on the use of mobile devices as a vehicle for faculty to incorporate active learning strategies, I find this interview, and the research conducted enlightening and valuable.

Posted via web from

Lets Ban Chalk, by Rodd Lucier (@thecleversheep)

Click through this fascinating presentation on technology and education by Rodd Lucier. (@thecleversheep) Thanks to @courosa for bringing it to my attention.

With the current structure of education, there are significant hurdles preventing educators and students from capitalizing on the convergence technology is capable of providing. How students learn is evolving to include new media, while teaching methodologies are slow to adjust.

This presentation calls for change, but not for change’s sake, rather, because the possibilities of impacting millions of learners around the world are limitless.

Well done, sir!

See http://thecleversheep.com/ for more from Rodd Lucier!

Posted via web from David Middleton’s posterous

икони